
BLOOD, OIL AND TEARS
Bolivia
and Paraguay are not in the good books of the Financial Action Task Force,
the inter-governmental organisation founded in 1989, which sets the global
standards for combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
The FATF in February recognised that although both countries have
made commitments to address material deficiencies, they now need further
encouragement and prompting to achieve positive results.
The
FATF is especially displeased with Ecuador and has placed it in a category
of recalcitrant nations (such as North Korea) because the country has not
yet made a high-level political commitment to FATF standards in key areas
such as criminalising money laundering and terrorist financing; and adequate
procedures to identify and freeze terrorist assets have not been put in
place either. Ecuador’s
president, Rafael Correa, has rejected the FATF’s findings and has hotly
disputed the claim that the country’s legislation is inadequate to protect
the banks against money laundering and terrorism financing.
He charges that it is because of Ecuador’s growing ties with Iran
(which has opened an embassy in Quito) while the United States of America
and other governments continue to pressure Iran not to develop its nuclear
programme any further. Ecuador’s
private bank association agrees with the president, noting a 2009 agreement
between the country’s Central Bank and some Iranian financial
institutions. Meanwhile, as
mentioned in last month’s Latin Letter (“The Chilean Way”), Chile has
amended its bank secrecy laws and Costa Rica, the second most dynamic
economy in Central America after Panama, is following suit (although it does
not in fact have stand-alone legislation on bank secrecy but rather a
scattering of statutory provisions which cover confidentiality in the areas
of commerce, banking and taxes). Costa
Rica will be featured in next month’s column.
Ecuador’s
obstinance in its dealings with the OECD reflect the politics of Rafael
Correa who has allied himself with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez and
Bolivian President Evo Morales; all three are outspoken critics of the US as
well as advocates of a South American drive towards nationalisation.
Besides upsetting the US over Iran, Ecuador has fought against
entering into a free trade treaty with Washington and last year the US lost
its use of Manta air base when the treaty expired and President Correa
refused to renew it.
Rafael
Correa became president in 2007 and he quickly concentrated his efforts on
voter support for a referendum to draft a new constitution that he said
would place more power in the hands of the poor.
His critics at the time said that it would be the president’s
powers that would, in fact, be increased.
Despite an opposition-controlled Congress, however, 64% of the
electorate approved the new constitution which also allowed a president to
stand for re-election for a second term; this President Correa did and which
led to a convincing victory in April last year.
President
Correa, who speaks both English and French, has a doctorate in economics
from the University of Illinois in the US and is a former professor at
Quito’s San Francisco University. He
rose to power without any political party backing and in 2005 he was
appointed economy minister. After
only four months in the post, however, he was forced to resign after
publicly berating the World Bank for refusing to give Ecuador a loan.
Such outbursts seem symptomatic of Ecuador’s leaders and Rafael
Correa’s kindred spirit was probably the colourful and well-loved José
María Velasco Ibarra who was both temperamental and an outstanding orator.
He would say: “Give me
a balcony and I will be president!” He
was, in 1934, 1944, 1952, 1960 and 1968, but both the establishment and the
army regarded him as a firebrand and so he was allowed to serve only one
full term.
The
country has a turbulent political history – since 1997 three presidents
have been ousted – and until the discovery of oil in the 1960s by the
American company, Texaco, which today is known as Chevron Texaco, Ecuador
was often described as a backwater. The
country’s Amazon oil fields, however, have caused deforestation and
environmental damage which has led to a multi-billion-US dollar lawsuit
against Chevron Texaco, further souring relations with the US and a major
factor in bringing the free trade talks with the US to a standstill.
When
the Spanish arrived in 1530 the country was ruled by the Incas and once
independence came in 1820 claims to parts of its territory were made by
neighbours: Ecuador lost two
wars with Colombia, one with Brazil and another with Peru.
The country originally was ruled by either generals or strongmen,
although since 1987 its democracy has been consolidated and a small ruling
class has been supplemented by a growing middle class.
Before then presidents, at least in the 20th century, were
continually battling personal rivalries as well as two opposing rival
factions represented by the Government in Quito nestling in the Andes near
the slopes of a volcano and the powerful merchants in Guayaquil which is
both the main port and the commercial capital of Ecuador.
Although
its close ally, Venezuela, is struggling with inflation, Ecuador has been
able to control its own according to a report in the Latin America Advisor;
economists have pointed out that because Ecuador now only uses the US dollar
as legal tender it is unable to print more money to finance its budget.
By contrast Venezuela could see its inflation rate reach a 14-year
high this year following its currency devaluation in January which has
pushed up the costs of imports upon which it heavily relies.
Morgan Stanley, the New York-based bank, believes that the
country’s inflation rate could reach 45 per cent following last year’s
27 per cent increase which was the highest annual inflation rate among 78
economies tracked by Bloomberg. A
devaluation in 1996 hit consumer prices which soared 103 per cent but this
recent devaluation will have one short-term benefit: by
increasing the local currency value of oil exports, which account for 90 per
cent of Venezuela’s exports, debt payments up to the end of next year will
be able to be made
Ecuador
is also a member of that group of Latin America countries with an
over-dependency on one commodity. It
may be copper in Chile, but it is oil in both Venezuela and Ecuador and in
June, 2007, (“Distant Thunder”, Issue ___)I reminded readers of how
Mexico’s oil bonanza came to an abrupt halt when prices plummeted in 1981;
the peso nosedived, capital took
flight and the banks were nationalised.
Falling oil prices near the end of the 20th century were
also a major contributor to driving the Ecuadorian economy into recession.
Despite
the environmental impact mentioned earlier, revenues from Amazon oil are
critical to the country’s economy and with the huge potential of untapped
reserves, there is a lot of incentive to increase production. Ecuador is a
member of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and depends on
oil for a third of its national budget. Sadly, the volcanic Galapagos
Islands, Ecuador’s possession some 600 miles off its coast, with its
unique animals and birds which inspired Charles Darwin’s evolutionary
theories, are probably the only Ecuadorean territory guaranteed sanctuary
from such economic pressures: certainly the protests of the Amazonian tribes
threatened by oil exploration seem but cries in the wilderness.
“We
were here thousands of years before Christopher Columbus arrived – the
land can’t be touched, its our inalienable right”.
Will that plea from Milton Carrera, president of the Achuar, one of 3
tribes that will be greatly affected by oil drilling, be heard?
The cynic in me recalls that Charles Darwin referred to the survival
of the fittest which was exemplified in the sentiments expressed by the late
American actor, John Wayne: “I
don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them.
There were great numbers of people who needed new land and the
Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves”.
In
January Ecuador’s foreign minister, Fander Falconi, resigned after
President Correa criticised his handling of negotiations to protect an
Amazon reserve from oil exploration by securing international donations of
US$3 billion. A frustrated
president has set a deadline of June for the initiative to be concluded
otherwise he might find his own solution.
For the hapless tribesmen it could mean that although blood may be
thicker than water, oil is thicker than blood.